Skip to main content
InjuryClaimHub

Mass Tort Eligibility Screener

Check every situation that applies to you or a family member. This tool only matches you to the guide covering that litigation's current status — it does not evaluate whether you actually have a claim.

Why this tool doesn't score or rank matches

The lawyer-need checklist elsewhere on this site weighs factors to produce one overall read, because that question — does this claim benefit from representation — really is a matter of degree. Whether your history matches a specific mass tort isn't: either your situation fits the fact pattern a litigation is built around, or it doesn't, and a weighted score would just obscure that. See our explainer on how mass tort litigation actually works for the framework behind every guide this tool links to, and our do I need a lawyer? checklist for the representation question once you know which guide applies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a match mean I have a valid claim?

No. A match only means your situation shares the basic fact pattern a specific litigation is built around — it is a pointer to the right information, not an eligibility determination. Whether you actually have a viable claim depends on medical documentation, timing, and your state's law, which only an attorney reviewing your specific facts can evaluate.

What if none of these match me?

That doesn't mean you have no claim — it means your situation isn't one of the litigations this tool currently covers. New mass torts open regularly, and a condition or exposure not listed here can still support an individual product liability or medical malpractice claim outside any existing MDL. See our explainer on how mass tort litigation works for the underlying framework regardless of which specific litigation applies.

Why does Camp Lejeune have a warning the others don't?

Because it is the one litigation on this list where the door is closed for most new claimants — the deadline to file a new administrative claim passed in August 2024. Being told that up front matters more than for the others, where new claims are generally still being accepted.

Can I match more than one litigation?

Yes, if your history genuinely involves more than one — for example, both Roundup exposure and a separate hair relaxer history. Each is evaluated independently; there's no reason checking more than one would be unusual or would weaken either potential claim.

How current is this information?

The matching criteria themselves (the general fact pattern each litigation is built around) are stable, but the linked guides carry the actual settlement status, deadlines and case counts, and those are the pages that get updated as the litigation moves. Always open the linked guide rather than relying on this tool's wording alone for anything time-sensitive.